Index | Australia | UK | Europe | USA | Canada | Africa | Russia | China | Asia | South America
  Gas Accidents | Environment | Economics | Health | Politics | Citizen Journalism | About Us | Links | Contact Us

Index > Australia > Federal Government > Cotton Australia

Bookmark and Share

Related Stories

Australian Productivity Commission

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines


Pilliga | Gloucester | Camden | Northern Rivers


AGL Gloucester Milk Experiment
Is Fracking Produced Water Safe in Our Milk?

Gloucester stands up to corporate gas giant AGL

Gloucester Water Studies

MidCoast Water concerned at AGL's haste

2004 gas blow out 300m away in the same wells

Lies, damned lies, statistics
and AGL

AGL’s Gloucester ‘Produced Water’ Irrigation Trial
“A Sham and a Farce!”

CSG companies ignore water quality guidelines in irrigation reports

NoFibs Gloucester Showdown

Fracking near Gloucester homes under AGL’s latest coal seam gas plans

Federal member for Lyne
Dr David Gillespie

AGL buys up Hunter Valley vineyards

AGL versus
Environment Protection Agency 2013

A matter of trust: – letter to Gloucester Advocate

Rob Oakeshott's coal seam gas press releases
2013 - 2012 - 2011 - 2010
Water Trigger - Gloucester BioRegion - Hunter Valley health

2011 NSW Parliament
Inquiry into Coal Seam Gas

Affected Mid North Coast Councils

Upper Hunter Shire Council

Thomas Davey, Tourism Advancing Gloucester

MidCoast Water

New South Wales Farmers Associations Dairy Committee

Bruce Robertson,
Beef cattle farmer

Steven Robinson, Psychiatrist

Barrington-Gloucester-Stroud Preservation Alliance

Manning Alliance

Federal | NSW | Victoria | Queensland | Western Australia | South Australia | Tasmania

Coal Seam Gas
Australian Federal Government

Grower CSG rights clarified by Gasfields Commission

1st October 2013 - Cotton Australia - Queensland’s Gasfields Commission has clarified rights for growers potentially affected by mining and/or coal seam gas (CSG) operations, after enquiries made by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia asked the Gasfields Commission to clarify make good provisions - specifically whether liability for water quality and quality existed in perpetuity with either the mining / CSG proponent or government. The Commission clarified that the mining / CSG proponent is liable. Unfortunately, once agreement has been struck there is no further recourse available for growers.

The Department of Environment & Heritage Protection is in the process of completing a fact sheet on make good provisions, and Cotton Australia will distribute this when it becomes available.

Cotton Australia also queried the Commission about Conduct & Compensation Agreements (CCA), particularly as they applied to directional drilling (ie horizontal drilling begun from a site which accesses resources under adjacent properties). The Commission clarified that CCAs only apply to surface issues.

However, where drilling activity creates a compensatable effect on a neighbouring property, that landowner may seek compensation from the petroleum authority holder (after establishing the compensatable effect).

Cotton Australia’s Mining & CSG Policy Officer- Sahil Prasad will continue to lobby on behalf of growers on these issues over the next year.

The above media release by Cotton Australia is published in full

Water Users Offer to Break CSG Deadlock

4 October 2013 - Cotton Australia and the New South Wales Irrigators Council are seeking a meeting with Premier Barry O'Farrell to offer solutions on coal seam gas in the State.

Irrigators Council Chief Executive Officer Andrew Gregson says that agricultural water users were greatly disappointed with new planning structures announced this week, but that solutions remain available.

"In a meeting earlier this year, the Premier asked us to come up with solutions and to keep talking to them. Whilst the process announced this week simply isn't acceptable, we have developed solutions and we don't believe it is too late to incorporate them.

Sahil Prasad, Policy Officer for Coal Seam Gas and Mining at Cotton Australia, says significant exclusions zone have been established in the newly released process but that they don't apply to agricultural water users in the main.

"If you live in a town, breed horses or grow wine in the Hunter Valley, the new process has catered to at least some of your demands. If you irrigate crops across NSW, though, you're still faced with significant problems from mines and gas.

The groups are seeking comprehensive baseline data on water and soil; critical industry cluster status for irrigation farms; and fulfilment of an election commitment to introduce a binding Aquifer Interference Regulation providing capacity for the Minister for Water to protect water resources absolutely.

A three page position paper (here) from NSWIC provides further details.

"We recognise a need for the NSW Government to balance competing demands. We believe that our three requirements will provide a strong, sustainable and fair basis for agriculture, mining and gas to move forward. At the same time, we'll offer the Premier a compromise in the meeting - accept any two and we can all move forward"


The editors of advise that this website is encouraging all political parties to contribute, especially if their policies place the health, well-being and rights of citizens ahead of mining profits.


The editors of advise that this website is encouraging all political parties to contribute, especially if their policies place the health, well-being and rights of citizens ahead of mining profits.

NSW | Victoria | Queensland | Western Australia | South Australia | Tasmania





site search by freefind